Crimes of Fashion

The LAPD and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department coordinated the largest raid ever on the Santee Alley downtown LA shopping district in late 2007, confiscating $8 million in counterfeit goods and arresting 26 people.  Among the confiscated merchandise were designs copied from labels such as Prada, Rolex, Fendi and Gucci.  The LAPD wants to send the message that selling counterfeit goods will no longer be tolerated.

The sales of counterfeit goods on the streets of Los Angeles presents a special problem in the city because, according to City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo, there is evidence that some of it is funding street gang activities.  It is a lucrative alternative to other illegal activities, without the same level of danger or tough penalties.  Some gangs, for example, charge "rent" to street merchants, or extort counterfeit merchandise from businesses to sell themselves.  Consequently, according to Kris Buckner of Investigative Consultants, the involvement of gangs in the counterfeit market is making "law enforcement take a second look" at these types of crimes, as a means to disrupt gang activity.

Other countries have dealt with similar issues.  The United Kingdom, for example, saw an explosion of funding for organized crime and international terrorism in 2004 from sales of counterfeit goods.  To address this problem, U.K authorities hired 4,500 additional "copyright police" to increase the frequency of surprise raids, the level of intelligence, and criminal prosecutions to keep the "crimelords" off the street.

This growing connection between merchants of counterfeit goods and street gangs is putting pressure on local law enforcement to enforce the anti-counterfeit laws with more vigor.  As enforcement improves, losses to legitimate designers and manufacturers caused by the sale of counterfeit goods in the city should decrease.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.fashionapparellawblog.com/admin/trackback/55377
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Neither the content on this blog nor any transmissions between you and Sheppard Mullin through this blog are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship. In communicating with us through this blog, you should not provide any confidential information to us concerning any potential or actual legal matter you may have. Before providing any such information to us, you must obtain approval to do so from one of our lawyers. By choosing to communicate with us without such prior approval, you understand and agree that Sheppard Mullin will have no duty to keep confidential any information you provide.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.